THE POISON GARDEN website      Arum maculatum berries on a Cannabis leaf 

Search thepoisongarden.co.uk:

This free script provided by JavaScript Kit

Pontifications on Poison

Being some ramblings on events associated with poisonous plants.

Tuesday 28th February 2012

There are many victims of the war on drugs. There are those who, because of the illegal status of the substance(s) concerned, fail to seek help when their use starts to become uncontrolled. There are those involved in supplying illegal markets who may find themselves incarcerated, wounded or killed as a result of their activities. And there are the relatives and friends of these first line causalities who, because of their association, have their lives blighted and become second line casualties.

But there are also those whose lives become blighted by the international regime for dealing with psychoactive substances and prosecuting the war on drugs without them taking any of these substances themselves and, quite possibly, without them being related to or knowing anyone who does. These are the victims of the International Narcotic Control Board (INCB) whose annual report is published today.

I mentioned on Sunday, the ‘Technical Report’ setting out the estimated requirements for what the UN calls ‘Narcotic Drugs’ even though many of them have a stimulating effect not a narcotic one. I’ve been wrestling with that report, and making very little progress because there is just so much detail and it is so over-stated. Does anyone seriously believe that a country can estimate its need for morphine, for example, to the nearest 1gm? I have to wonder if the officials in Saudi Arabia, India and the USA, to give three examples, know how ridiculous their figures are when they submit them to the INCB.

What I wanted to do was test the hypothesis that some countries limit the availability of licit medications derived from the same plants, like Papaver somniferum and Erythroxylum coca, as substances within the scope of the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs because they fear the consequences if the INCB finds that some of those licit supplies are leaking into the illicit market.

That turned out to be far more complex than you would have thought but, while I was still wrestling with it, the INCB annual report came along and gave me the answer I was looking for. Before I come to that, though, I want to write a little more about the INCB itself.

I can’t help thinking that the big mistake was made by whoever decided on the name in the first place. I suppose that, if you’re going to have an international regime for controlling certain substances, you need some way of evaluating how well it is working but you could do that with an International Narcotic Monitoring Board. It’s that word ‘Control’ that causes all the problems because the INCB really thinks its role is to control the actions of sovereign states.

And the real trouble comes when those sovereign states are so cowed by the threats of what could happen to them, in terms of lost aid and becoming international pariahs, that they, in effect, cede control to the INCB by trying to stay out of the licit market. It really seems as though this has led to the INCB reinforcing its own sense of itself so that it now uses the language of the schoolteacher intent of punishing any transgression and equally intent on subduing any tendency to transgress.

That control language is, of course, mixed with the language of prohibition where things are viewed from a particular position and the logical deductions to be made from the language used just don’t get made.

Almost all you need to know about the INCB is in the foreword by Hamid Ghodse, the INCB President. Here are a few examples.

For many reformers, the argument for change starts with the fact that the 1961 Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs calls for countries to ‘limit exclusively to medical and
scientific purposes the production, manufacture, export, import, distribution of, trade in, use
and possession of drugs’. This has not happened and, therefore, critics cite over forty years of failure when referring to the convention.

The INCB, however, sees its origins, not in the 1961 single Convention but in the 1912 International Opium Convention signed in The Hague. Mr Ghodse, with no irony whatever, dedicates the 2012 INCB Annual Report to one hundred years of failure.

He writes;

‘Prior to the adoption of the 1912 Convention, the world was experiencing an abysmal
situation with regard to drugs. In most countries, trade in drugs was not regulated and
substance abuse was widespread.’

I think a great many people would have followed that by noting that very little has changed in the past century but, of course, that is not the view from the inside of the INCB because Mr Ghodse writes;

‘Over the past 100 years, significant achievements have been made in international drug
control’

I suppose that’s a reasonable thing to say if you are referring to the growth in the bureaucracy that has grown up around ‘international drug control’ but it is completely unreasonable if you are trying to suggest that there is any real control on the availability of illicit drugs.

But then he writes a sentence that does not have an ambiguity of interpretation and is, thus, just plain wrong;

‘The international drug control system is a great example of how multilateralism can succeed in bringing benefits to humanity, preventing the abuse of drugs, as well as the harm caused by such abuse, while ensuring adequate availability of drugs for medical and scientific purposes, including the treatment of pain and mental illness.’

There are two parts to that sentence. First, there is no justification for suggesting that the control regime has had any success in ‘preventing the abuse of drugs’ and, second, the notion of ‘adequate availability’ is bizarre, especially in light of what he writes six paragraphs further on.

But before getting to that, I want to look at two other points. The first gives a clear indication of the schoolmasterly bullying that underlies almost all of what the INCB does. As it was legally permitted to do Bolivia, last year, denounced the Single Convention and then reacceded to it but with a reservation over the use of coca leaves by Bolivians in the way that has been done for hundreds, if not thousands, of years. It’s worth a reminder, at this point, that a WHO survey, suppressed by the USA because it didn’t like its findings, reported this traditional, cultural use as producing almost no harm whatever.

Mr Gohdse’s reaction, however, is to describe Bolivia’s action as ‘One major challenge to the international drug control system’ and to call it ‘contrary to the fundamental object and spirit of the Convention’. Is the control system operated by the INCB really so weak and ineffectual that it can be threatened by action taken by one small country and affecting, mostly, peasant farmers?

Mr Gohdse ends his foreword by writing;

‘As we celebrate the centennial of the signing of the International Opium Convention at The
Hague in 1912, let us also celebrate the achievements of the international drug control system in the past century and bolster our efforts to make the next century of drug control even more successful than the last one.’

To look at these ‘achievements’ and get a sense of how ‘successful’ 100 years of ‘drug control’ has been, I’ll quote what I wrote on Sunday about the reasons for the INCB’s existence;

‘The International Narcotics Control Board has two functions; to make sure that people who might benefit from the therapeutic properties of these substances are able to get them and to limit the diversion of such medicines to illicit use. That’s my summary the full mandate can be read here’

The ‘success’ of that first function is spelled out by Mr Gohdse himself when he writes;

‘About 80 per cent of the world’s population has limited or no access to controlled substances; that means that in most countries many people are suffering unnecessarily.’

By his own hand, Mr Gohdse is saying that around 5.5 billion people are excluded from proper medical care and we can only speculate how many suffer serious long-term pain or even choose to permanently end their suffering because the INCB has been so ‘successful’ in performing its role.

 

Full Entries

2016

Tuesday 25th October 2016
Saturday 20th August 2016
Sunday 6th March 2016
Wednesday 3rd February 2016

2015

Saturday 28th November 2015
Friday 27th November 2015
Monday 17th August 2015
Wednesday 15th July 2015
Friday 26th June 2015
Thursday 25th June 2015
Thursday 30th April 2015
Wednesday 29th April 2015
Wednesday 11th March 2015
Tuesday 3rd March 2015
Saturday 28th February 2015
Sunday 22nd February 2015

November 2014

Monday 24th November 2014
Saturday 8th November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

Wednesday 24th September 2014
Monday 1st September 2014

August 2014

Tuesday 26th August 2014
Saturday 16th August 2014
Tuesday 5th August 2014
Friday 1st August 2014

July 2014

Sunday 27th July 2014
Wednesday 23rd July 2014
Sunday 13th July 2014
Sunday 6th July 2014
Tuesday 1st July 2014

June 2014

Wednesday 25th June 2014
Tuesday 24th June 2014
Sunday 22nd June 2014
Monday 9th June 2014
Wednesday 4th June 2014

May 2014

Monday 26th May 2014
Sunday 18th May 2014
Wednesday 14th May 2014

April 2014

Sunday 13th April 2014
Saturday 5th April 2014
Thursday 3rd April 2014
Tuesday 1st April 2014

March 2014

Monday 31st March 2014
Tuesday 25th March 2014
Friday 21st March 2014
Monday 17th March 2014
Sunday 16th March 2014
Tuesday 11th March 2014
Tuesday 11th March 2014
Thursday 6th March 2014
Wednesday 5th March 2014
Saturday 1st March 2014

February 2014

Thursday 27th February 2014
Monday 24th February 2014
Wednesday 19th February 2014
Monday 17th February 2014
Thursday 13th February 2014
Monday 4th February 2014
Monday 3rd February 2014
Saturday 1st February 2014

January 2014

Thursday 28th January 2014
Thursday 23rd January 2014
Friday 17th January 2014
Wednesday 15th January 2014
Monday 13th January 2014
Thursday 9th January 2014
Tuesday 7th January 2014
Wednesday 1st January 2014

December 2013

Monday 23rd December 2013
Friday 20th December 2013
Tuesday 17th December 2013
Friday 14th December 2013
Thursday 12th December 2013
Sunday 8th December 2013
Wednesday 4th December 2013
Sunday 1st December 2013

November 2013

Friday 29th November 2013
Wednesday 27th November 2013
Tuesday 26th November 2013
Friday 22nd November 2013
Monday 18th November 2013
Friday 15th November 2013
Thursday 14th November 2013
Sunday 10th November 2013
Thursday 7th November 2013
Wednesday 6th November 2013
Friday 1st November 2013

October 2013

Thursday 31st October 2013
Sunday 27th October 2013
Wednesday 23rd October 2013
Monday 21st October 2013
Friday 18th October 2013
Friday 11th October 2013
Wednesday 9th October 2013
Tuesday 8th October 2013
Monday 7th October 2013
Tuesday 1st October 2013

September 2013

Monday 30th September 2013
Saturday 28th September 2013
Friday 27th September 2013
Monday 23rd September 2013
Sunday 15th September 2013
Monday 9th September 2013
Tuesday 3rd September 2013
Sunday 1st September 2013

August 2013

Sunday 8th September 2013
Tuesday 3rd September 2013
Sunday 1st September 2013

Tuesday 27th August 2013
Sunday 25th August 2013
Monday 19th August 2013
Friday 16th August 2013
Tuesday 13th August 2013
Friday 9th August 2013
Friday 2nd August 2013
Thursday 1st August 2013

July 2013

Saturday 27th July 2013
Sunday 21st July 2013
Wednesday 17th July 2013
Monday 15th July 2013
Saturday 13th July 2013
Friday 12th July 2013
Thursday 11th July 2013
Wednesday 10th July 2013
Tuesday 9th July 2013
Saturday 6th July 2013

June 2013

Friday 28th June 2013
Tuesday 25th June 2013
Friday 21st June 2013
Thursday 20th June 2013
Wednesday 19th June 2013
Saturday 15th June 2013
Sunday 9th June 2013
Saturday 8th June 2013
Saturday 1st June 2013
 

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012 blog

June 2012 blog

May 2012 blog

April 2012 blog

March 2012 blog

February 2012 blog

January 2012 blog

December 2011 blog

November 2011 blog

October 2011 blog

September 2011 blog

August 2011 blog

July 2011 blog

June 2011 blog



IMPORTANT NOTE

The POISON GARDEN website is not connected with Alnwick Garden Enterprises Ltd and/or The Alnwick Garden Trust.