THE POISON GARDEN website      Arum maculatum berries on a Cannabis leaf 


This free script provided by JavaScript Kit

Pontifications on Poison

Being some ramblings on events associated with poisonous plants.

Tuesday 17th July 2012

I have to make a correction to what I wrote last Thursday. Actually, I think I need to make two corrections but I’ll come back to the second one.

After tweeting about my blog entry saying there was no Ragwort Awareness Week (RAW) this year, I received a tweet from the British Horse Society (BHS) saying that RAW is 23-29th July this year. At about the same time, my Google Alert for ‘ragwort’ took me to a couple of websites that had, clearly, received a press release from the BHS about RAW accompanied by some figures from the 2011 survey aimed at determining the extent of Jacobaea vulgaris (syn. Senecio jacobaea), common ragwort.

So, I was wrong to say there was no RAW and, frankly, I don’t like being wrong. I thought I’d better try and understand what led me to this error. It didn’t take long to find. The BHS webpage announcing the 2011 RAW is still online and it says;

‘While the results of this survey are important (see below), it’s not enough. By carrying out the survey in the same week annually (emphasis added), we are hoping to gain an insight into trends in ragwort proliferation and to strengthen the argument to control it.’

Since both RAW 2010 and 2011 began on the 2nd Monday in July, I took that paragraph at its word and concluded that RAW not having been announced by 9th July there would be no RAW 2012.

Jacobaea vulgaris (syn. Senecio jacobaea), common ragwort

I sent a tweet to the BHS asking why the dates had been changed given that this meant that the trends it said were of such importance could not be monitored but, at the time of writing, I haven’t had a reply.

The second correction I referred to at the start comes because, last week, I wrote;

‘…the society seems to be taking a more sensible and pragmatic approach to the issue of Jacobaea vulgaris (syn. Senecio jacobaea), common ragwort.’

From the two pieces my Google Alert pointed out1, I have realised that this statement was not correct. The BHS has placed its press release on its website and it makes for very discouraging reading. The second paragraph says;

'Every year, animals die painful and unnecessary deaths as a result of damage to their liver from consuming Ragwort.'

The expectation is that you will accept that as fact because no figures are given to support it.

There's been a change when it comes to giving the intention of the surveys. The BHS now says;

'By carrying out the survey annually, the BHS is hoping to gain an insight into trends in ragwort proliferation'

whilst ignoring the fact that the change of date makes it impossible to reliably demonstrate a trend.

I should also mention that I'm unhappy with the use of the word 'proliferation'. That says the BHS has decided ragwort is spreading never mind what the evidence suggests. In effect, the BHS position is that it wants to make people believe ragwort is becoming more prevalent and it is encouraging people to contribute information only in support of that position.

The 2011 survey found that 20,781 horses were reported ‘grazing either on, or within 50 metres of, fields containing ragwort’.1 The 2010 survey found the number to be 13,189. That implies an increase of 58% in the number of animals ‘at risk’ from ragwort.

Where shall I start?

When trying to understand the World Drugs Report for 2012, I wrote about people overstating the accuracy of their data. There is absolutely no way that the BHS surveys are accurate to one single horse. Even if the reporting were reliable, (I’ll come to that) the chances of errors in counting horses in a field are such that ten different people would likely arrive at ten different totals. Quoting the figures to the nearest horse suggests that either the BHS doesn’t have anyone with any understanding of maths or it doesn’t care whether its information is accurate or not.

Let’s go back to whether the reporting is, in any event, reliable. I’ve written about this before but just to repeat, this is a self-report survey with no attempt to check whether people completing it have any competence to identify common ragwort (the only species of ragwort controlled by the Weeds Act 1959). There is no obligation to provide identifying details and no attempt to prevent one person making multiple submissions. I know this because I've completed it three or four times. The survey is still open for completion so this cannot be the “snapshot survey” that it is being reported to be.

Jacobaea vulgaris (syn. Senecio jacobaea), common ragwort

The BHS doesn’t say how many submissions it received for either survey. You would expect word to spread about any event and, therefore, it is likely that more people were aware of the survey in 2011 than in 2010. If, say, twice as many people completed the survey then that apparent 58% increase in the number of animals exposed actually becomes a decrease in exposure.

Then there is the matter of outcomes. To get an understanding of what this alleged exposure to Jacobaea vulgaris meant you would need to have figures for the number of horses diagnosed as suffering from liver disease. This is the classic Jerry Maguire test situation. Where are all the diseased or dead horses? The BHS, in fact, shoots itself in the foot if its claimed 58% increase in exposure to ragwort does not produce any increase in the number of animals becoming ill.

Still nothing from the BHS about the date change so I can only guess that it has something to do with having RAW in the English school holidays when more people are likely to be out in the countryside and there may be more responses to this year’s survey. It remains to be seen, of course, whether the survey is any better constructed this year.

What we have then are the unscientific results of the BHS surveys being used to press a campaign against a native plant rather than focus on the responsibilities of horse-owners to provide safe food for their animals.

The BHS release quotes Lee Hackett, BHS Senior Executive (Welfare), as saying;

'Our surveys so far have been a great success and produced some fascinating results that we can use in our lobbying to get some action taken. But we need far more data to help us get a handle on the true prevalence of ragwort, two years is not enough.'

Let me be completely clear about this; the surveys undertaken by the BHS will NEVER 'get a handle on the true prevalence of ragwort' and, even if they did, the prevalence is not important. It is the harm that matters and the BHS should spend its time discovering the true extent of disease from ragwort.

The most recent accounts for the BHS show that it had a surplus of income over expenditure of £0.7m and reserves of £8.9m so it is a well-financed organisation.

My question to the BHS is, therefore, if it is convinced that common ragwort is causing such a problem, why does it not use some of its substantial reserves to undertake a proper, rigorous study of the effects of pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PAs) and then, if substantial effects are proved, finance a further study to identify the source of those PAs be it living Jacobaea vulgaris, conserved forage that has not been properly produced or any of the many other plants that contain PAs?  


1.Make getting rid of ragwort a priority says horse charity Smallholder 16th July 2012 


Full Entries


Tuesday 25th October 2016
Saturday 20th August 2016
Sunday 6th March 2016
Wednesday 3rd February 2016


Saturday 28th November 2015
Friday 27th November 2015
Monday 17th August 2015
Wednesday 15th July 2015
Friday 26th June 2015
Thursday 25th June 2015
Thursday 30th April 2015
Wednesday 29th April 2015
Wednesday 11th March 2015
Tuesday 3rd March 2015
Saturday 28th February 2015
Sunday 22nd February 2015

November 2014

Monday 24th November 2014
Saturday 8th November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

Wednesday 24th September 2014
Monday 1st September 2014

August 2014

Tuesday 26th August 2014
Saturday 16th August 2014
Tuesday 5th August 2014
Friday 1st August 2014

July 2014

Sunday 27th July 2014
Wednesday 23rd July 2014
Sunday 13th July 2014
Sunday 6th July 2014
Tuesday 1st July 2014

June 2014

Wednesday 25th June 2014
Tuesday 24th June 2014
Sunday 22nd June 2014
Monday 9th June 2014
Wednesday 4th June 2014

May 2014

Monday 26th May 2014
Sunday 18th May 2014
Wednesday 14th May 2014

April 2014

Sunday 13th April 2014
Saturday 5th April 2014
Thursday 3rd April 2014
Tuesday 1st April 2014

March 2014

Monday 31st March 2014
Tuesday 25th March 2014
Friday 21st March 2014
Monday 17th March 2014
Sunday 16th March 2014
Tuesday 11th March 2014
Tuesday 11th March 2014
Thursday 6th March 2014
Wednesday 5th March 2014
Saturday 1st March 2014

February 2014

Thursday 27th February 2014
Monday 24th February 2014
Wednesday 19th February 2014
Monday 17th February 2014
Thursday 13th February 2014
Monday 4th February 2014
Monday 3rd February 2014
Saturday 1st February 2014

January 2014

Thursday 28th January 2014
Thursday 23rd January 2014
Friday 17th January 2014
Wednesday 15th January 2014
Monday 13th January 2014
Thursday 9th January 2014
Tuesday 7th January 2014
Wednesday 1st January 2014

December 2013

Monday 23rd December 2013
Friday 20th December 2013
Tuesday 17th December 2013
Friday 14th December 2013
Thursday 12th December 2013
Sunday 8th December 2013
Wednesday 4th December 2013
Sunday 1st December 2013

November 2013

Friday 29th November 2013
Wednesday 27th November 2013
Tuesday 26th November 2013
Friday 22nd November 2013
Monday 18th November 2013
Friday 15th November 2013
Thursday 14th November 2013
Sunday 10th November 2013
Thursday 7th November 2013
Wednesday 6th November 2013
Friday 1st November 2013

October 2013

Thursday 31st October 2013
Sunday 27th October 2013
Wednesday 23rd October 2013
Monday 21st October 2013
Friday 18th October 2013
Friday 11th October 2013
Wednesday 9th October 2013
Tuesday 8th October 2013
Monday 7th October 2013
Tuesday 1st October 2013

September 2013

Monday 30th September 2013
Saturday 28th September 2013
Friday 27th September 2013
Monday 23rd September 2013
Sunday 15th September 2013
Monday 9th September 2013
Tuesday 3rd September 2013
Sunday 1st September 2013

August 2013

Sunday 8th September 2013
Tuesday 3rd September 2013
Sunday 1st September 2013

Tuesday 27th August 2013
Sunday 25th August 2013
Monday 19th August 2013
Friday 16th August 2013
Tuesday 13th August 2013
Friday 9th August 2013
Friday 2nd August 2013
Thursday 1st August 2013

July 2013

Saturday 27th July 2013
Sunday 21st July 2013
Wednesday 17th July 2013
Monday 15th July 2013
Saturday 13th July 2013
Friday 12th July 2013
Thursday 11th July 2013
Wednesday 10th July 2013
Tuesday 9th July 2013
Saturday 6th July 2013

June 2013

Friday 28th June 2013
Tuesday 25th June 2013
Friday 21st June 2013
Thursday 20th June 2013
Wednesday 19th June 2013
Saturday 15th June 2013
Sunday 9th June 2013
Saturday 8th June 2013
Saturday 1st June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012 blog

June 2012 blog

May 2012 blog

April 2012 blog

March 2012 blog

February 2012 blog

January 2012 blog

December 2011 blog

November 2011 blog

October 2011 blog

September 2011 blog

August 2011 blog

July 2011 blog

June 2011 blog


The POISON GARDEN website is not connected with Alnwick Garden Enterprises Ltd and/or The Alnwick Garden Trust.