THE POISON GARDEN website      Arum maculatum berries on a Cannabis leaf 


This free script provided by JavaScript Kit

Pontifications on Poison

Being some ramblings on events associated with poisonous plants.

Sunday 23rd September 2012

I doubt if there is anyone with even just a passing interest in psychoactive substances who is not aware that, later this week, Channel 4 will be broadcasting two programmes about the potential use of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA), ecstasy, for therapeutic purposes.

The first, on 26th September, will show volunteers taking MDMA and having the changes it makes in their brains identified by a scanner. The second, the next evening, will be a live discussion of the results and the wider aspects of drug policy.

Both programmes have been titled ‘Drugs Live: The Ecstasy Trial’ leading to a degree of misunderstanding because, although the first programme will be broadcast live, it will present pre-recorded trials. The suggestion in parts of the media has been that people will be taking drugs live on TV.

But that misunderstanding is just one part of the furore that has been stimulated by pre-publicity for the programme. The trial is being conducted by Prof. David Nutt in conjunction with University College London (UCL) and the Beckley Foundation. Prof. Nutt’s involvement almost guarantees controversy mostly based on a misrepresentation of his position on psychoactive substance policy. But there is an added element, which is that some people, it seems, feel that David Nutt has an inflated ego and seeks publicity for its own sake.

I can’t tell if that criticism comes from prohibitionists who don’t like that David Nutt’s profile is bringing rational debate into the arena of drug policy or just from people who don’t have the skills to get their own scientific agenda into the spotlight. Certainly David Nutt has raised his profile in recent months with his new book, ‘Drugs - Without the Hot Air: Minimising the Harms of Legal and Illegal Drugs’, his recent appearance on the BBC Radio 4 series ‘The Life Scientific’ and a number of newspapers stories, interviews and discussions, two of which I’ll return to, shortly.

Before looking at those, however, I recommend that you read what the organisations behind this trial have to say on their own websites. The Independent Scientific Committee on Drugs, the Beckley Foundation and UCL all have extensive pieces explaining the trial and why it was necessary to turn to Channel 4 to fund it.

Put simply, the extra expense of running a trial using an illegal substance, together with the controversy bound to be stirred up by prohibitionists, means that conventional sources of funding were not available. Having heard Prof. Nutt speak about the way the media distorts and misreports scientific work on psychoactive substances I suspect he is also pleased that this trial can be presented direct to the public and without its results being perverted by journalistic prejudice.

There has been a lot of coverage in the press and, in the mainstream media, it has been overwhelmingly hostile. Earlier today Prof Nutt tweeted ‘Balanced article from the @DailyMail on the study and #DrugsLive’ and linked to this piece ‘A vicar, a pop star's dad and an ex-MP all taking drugs on live TV. Pioneering science - or a cynical new low from Channel 4?’
I don’t know if David Nutt was being ironic or whether, in comparison to most of the coverage, this article does seem to him to treat the subject more fairly.

I won’t go through the piece line by line but two sentences are indicative. The first says ‘He has also suggested that horse-riding is more dangerous than taking Ecstasy.’ That horse-riding is more dangerous than ecstasy is not a suggestion. It is a demonstrable fact.

But the second is more insidious. Turning to one of the 'usual suspects' whenever ecstasy is mentioned the Mail says;

‘Yet ‘brave’ is not the word that Paul Betts, whose daughter Leah died on her 18th birthday in 1995 after taking Ecstasy, would use to describe it.’

Strictly speaking that sentence is true. Leah Betts did die after taking ecstasy. But she did not die as a result of the ecstasy. She died as a result of drinking massive amounts of water because she didn’t have access to information about how to counter the dehydration that can result from ecstasy use. If ecstasy had been legal, so that guidance could be readily available about its safe use, Leah Betts and many others would still be alive today.

So the Mail is right to say she died after taking ecstasy but it wants its readers to conclude that she died because of the ecstasy.

The other piece worth examining appeared on the Guardian website in its ‘Comment is free’  section and is entitled ‘David Nutt and Julia Manning: is it right to take ecstasy in a TV trial?’ It is in the form of an interview conducted with the two people named in the headline. I am not going to attack Julia Manning personally; I’d never heard of her before today. But, the fact is that she is a qualified optometrist who, after standing for parliament in 2005, formed a think tank called ‘’ self-described by its website as ‘an independent, grass roots think tank whose purpose is to both improve individual health and create the conditions for a healthy society’.

So, not an expert on psychoactive substances.

The problem for critics of Prof. Nutt is that it is very hard to criticise what he believes in so they have to make claims about him that are simply untrue. Thus Julia Manning accuses David Nutt of ‘wanting to legalise access to drugs’. The printed version has that as ‘wanting to legalise access to [some] drugs’. I assume the ‘some’ was added after. But anyone who understands Nutt’s position knows that as he says later in this piece ‘I am anti-drugs’. ‘[M]y entire research career has been directed towards understanding the harms of drugs so we can minimise them’.

Then Ms Manning makes one of those illogical assertions that so often trip up prohibitionists. Prof Nutt points out that many of the substances classified under the Misuse of Drugs Act have approved medical uses so he wants to see if ecstasy might have a medical use. Julia Manning who is critical of this trial being conducted at all says that those medical uses resulted from trials. Well, if medical uses of things like opium, from Papaver somniferum, ketamine and amphetamines resulted from properly conducted trials where is the harm in carrying out a properly conducted trial of MDMA?

The final point I want to draw attention to is where Ms Manning either reveals how little she knows about the subject or simply gives a false figure. The interviewer suggests that drugs are a fact of life. Ms Manning disagrees with this saying ‘Only three million adults have tried drugs’. If we assume that ‘have tried’ means lifetime prevalence, and I don’t know what else it could mean, and if we take ‘drugs’ to mean all substances classified under the MDA then the figure for 15-64 year olds is something over 15 million. If we restrict the definition of ‘drugs’ to Class A the number falls to over 6 million and, if we look only at ecstasy, the number is 3.5 million not 3 million.

Ms Manning is trying to present drug use as limited to a small part of society because that is what prohibitionists do; they try and suggest drugs are used by an aberrant minority that the rest of society should condemn.

You can be sure that there will be nothing in this week’s programmes to change the mind of Ms Manning and her like but, by presenting information directly to the viewers, there is a small hope that a rational assessment can be made of the situation without the filter of ignorant prejudice.     


Full Entries


Tuesday 25th October 2016
Saturday 20th August 2016
Sunday 6th March 2016
Wednesday 3rd February 2016


Saturday 28th November 2015
Friday 27th November 2015
Monday 17th August 2015
Wednesday 15th July 2015
Friday 26th June 2015
Thursday 25th June 2015
Thursday 30th April 2015
Wednesday 29th April 2015
Wednesday 11th March 2015
Tuesday 3rd March 2015
Saturday 28th February 2015
Sunday 22nd February 2015

November 2014

Monday 24th November 2014
Saturday 8th November 2014

October 2014

September 2014

Wednesday 24th September 2014
Monday 1st September 2014

August 2014

Tuesday 26th August 2014
Saturday 16th August 2014
Tuesday 5th August 2014
Friday 1st August 2014

July 2014

Sunday 27th July 2014
Wednesday 23rd July 2014
Sunday 13th July 2014
Sunday 6th July 2014
Tuesday 1st July 2014

June 2014

Wednesday 25th June 2014
Tuesday 24th June 2014
Sunday 22nd June 2014
Monday 9th June 2014
Wednesday 4th June 2014

May 2014

Monday 26th May 2014
Sunday 18th May 2014
Wednesday 14th May 2014

April 2014

Sunday 13th April 2014
Saturday 5th April 2014
Thursday 3rd April 2014
Tuesday 1st April 2014

March 2014

Monday 31st March 2014
Tuesday 25th March 2014
Friday 21st March 2014
Monday 17th March 2014
Sunday 16th March 2014
Tuesday 11th March 2014
Tuesday 11th March 2014
Thursday 6th March 2014
Wednesday 5th March 2014
Saturday 1st March 2014

February 2014

Thursday 27th February 2014
Monday 24th February 2014
Wednesday 19th February 2014
Monday 17th February 2014
Thursday 13th February 2014
Monday 4th February 2014
Monday 3rd February 2014
Saturday 1st February 2014

January 2014

Thursday 28th January 2014
Thursday 23rd January 2014
Friday 17th January 2014
Wednesday 15th January 2014
Monday 13th January 2014
Thursday 9th January 2014
Tuesday 7th January 2014
Wednesday 1st January 2014

December 2013

Monday 23rd December 2013
Friday 20th December 2013
Tuesday 17th December 2013
Friday 14th December 2013
Thursday 12th December 2013
Sunday 8th December 2013
Wednesday 4th December 2013
Sunday 1st December 2013

November 2013

Friday 29th November 2013
Wednesday 27th November 2013
Tuesday 26th November 2013
Friday 22nd November 2013
Monday 18th November 2013
Friday 15th November 2013
Thursday 14th November 2013
Sunday 10th November 2013
Thursday 7th November 2013
Wednesday 6th November 2013
Friday 1st November 2013

October 2013

Thursday 31st October 2013
Sunday 27th October 2013
Wednesday 23rd October 2013
Monday 21st October 2013
Friday 18th October 2013
Friday 11th October 2013
Wednesday 9th October 2013
Tuesday 8th October 2013
Monday 7th October 2013
Tuesday 1st October 2013

September 2013

Monday 30th September 2013
Saturday 28th September 2013
Friday 27th September 2013
Monday 23rd September 2013
Sunday 15th September 2013
Monday 9th September 2013
Tuesday 3rd September 2013
Sunday 1st September 2013

August 2013

Sunday 8th September 2013
Tuesday 3rd September 2013
Sunday 1st September 2013

Tuesday 27th August 2013
Sunday 25th August 2013
Monday 19th August 2013
Friday 16th August 2013
Tuesday 13th August 2013
Friday 9th August 2013
Friday 2nd August 2013
Thursday 1st August 2013

July 2013

Saturday 27th July 2013
Sunday 21st July 2013
Wednesday 17th July 2013
Monday 15th July 2013
Saturday 13th July 2013
Friday 12th July 2013
Thursday 11th July 2013
Wednesday 10th July 2013
Tuesday 9th July 2013
Saturday 6th July 2013

June 2013

Friday 28th June 2013
Tuesday 25th June 2013
Friday 21st June 2013
Thursday 20th June 2013
Wednesday 19th June 2013
Saturday 15th June 2013
Sunday 9th June 2013
Saturday 8th June 2013
Saturday 1st June 2013

May 2013

April 2013

March 2013

February 2013

January 2013

December 2012

November 2012

October 2012

September 2012

August 2012

July 2012 blog

June 2012 blog

May 2012 blog

April 2012 blog

March 2012 blog

February 2012 blog

January 2012 blog

December 2011 blog

November 2011 blog

October 2011 blog

September 2011 blog

August 2011 blog

July 2011 blog

June 2011 blog


The POISON GARDEN website is not connected with Alnwick Garden Enterprises Ltd and/or The Alnwick Garden Trust.